RESILIENCE – BETWEEN MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION
Title
RESILIENT RESTORATION AND REUSE METHODS, INSTRUMENTS AND TOOLS
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19229/978-88-5509-096-4/3142020
Keywords
cultural heritage, resilience, reuse, sustainability, knowledge
Abstract
The paper presents a preliminary impact assessment method in the case of interventions for functional recovery and existing buildings regeneration, based on the concepts of resilience and sustainability. The research illustrates the theoretical, methodological and design aspects connected to the concept of resilience, understood as a transformation of an existing building, with particular attention to the definition of methods for the knowledge and evaluation of critical points and vulnerability of the architectural heritage. It’s considered as indispensable premise to understand the impact of possible design actions and to monitor the transformability thresholds of the building itself, in order to set up a sustainable reuse. The aim is to define and to describe a pre-planning analysis and assessment tool capable of supporting the decision-making processes. This synthetically stated methodology is the result of an ongoing research at the STEP Laboratory of the University of Pavia with the goal of proposing a tool capable of supporting decisions in the preliminary stages of processes oriented to adaptive reuse, in order to evaluate the compatibility of different transformative hypotheses coherently with the conservation needs of an existing building. The possible developments of this methodology could concern its application as decision support tools for building and urban regeneration interventions where the preliminary assessment of re-used sustainable scenarios and the impact evaluation on the existing buildings is necessary, starting from the preliminary phases of the design process.
Section
Architecture | Research & Experimentation
Resilient restoration and reuse. Methods, instruments and tools
pp. 248-259
Author(s)
Marco Morandotti, Daniela Besana
Author(s) Biography
Marco Morandotti, Engineer and PhD, is a Full Professor of Technical Architecture at the DICAr Department of the University of Pavia (Italy). He carries out research on the conservation and sustainable enhancement of Cultural Heritage, with reference to typological and technological design solutions.
Daniela Besana, Engineer/Architect and PhD, is an Associate Professor of Technical Architecture at the DICAr Department of the University of Pavia (Italy). She carries out research on the restoration and sustainable reuse of Cultural Heritage, with reference to construction technologies and design strategies for the intervention on the existing buildings.
References
Berkes, F. Colding, J. and Folke, C. (2003), Navigating social-ecological systems – Building resilience for complexity and change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK).
Colucci, A. (2012), Le città resilienti – Approcci e strategie, Jean Monnet Centre of Pavia, Pavia. [Online] Available at: www.jeanmonnet-pv.it/Jean_Monnet_Centre_of_Excellence/publications_files/full_txt_colucci_jm.pdf [Accessed 24 November 2019].
Decreto Legislativo 18 aprile 2016 n. 50, Codice dei contratti pubblici. [Online] Available at: www.bosettiegatti.eu/info/norme/statali/2016_0050.htm [Accessed 25November 2019].
Decreto Legislativo 22 gennaio 2004 n. 42, Codice dei beni culturali e del paesaggio. [Online] Available at: www.bosettiegatti.eu/info/norme/statali/2004_0042.htm [Accessed 25 November 2019].
Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T. and Rockström, J. (2010), “Resilience thinking: integrating resilience adaptability and transformability”, in Ecology and Society, vol. 15, n. 4, art. 20. [Online] Available at: www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/ [Accessed 24 November 2019].
Hassler, U. and Kohler, N. (2014), “Resilience in the built environment”, in Building Research & Information, vol. 42, issue 2, pp. 119-129. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.873593 [Accessed 24 November 2019].
Holling, C. S. (1973), “Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems”, in Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 4, issue 1, pp. 1-23. [Online] Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/2096802 [Accessed 24 November 2019].
Jigyasu, R. et alii (2013), Heritage and Resilience – Issues and Opportunities for Reducing Disaster Risks, Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva. [Online] Available at: nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/17231/1/Heritage_and_Resilience_Report_for_UNISDR_2013.pdf [Accessed 24 November 2019].
Morandotti, M., Besana, D., Cecchini, C. and Chiesa, A. (2019), “Challenges of sustainable reuse – A resilience-based approach”, in Biscontin, G. and Driussi, G. (eds), Il patrimonio culturale in mutamento. Le sfide dell’uso – Scienza e Beni Culturali, XXXV Convegno Internazionale 2019, Edizioni Arcadia Ricerche, Venezia, pp. 331-342.
Petersen, S. and Svendsen, S. (2010), “Method and simulation program informed decisions in the early stages of building design”, in Energy and Buildings, vol. 42, issue 7, pp. 1113-1119. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.02.002 [Accessed 24 November 2019].
Schlueter, A. and Thesseling, F. (2009), “Building Information model based energy/exergy performance assessment in early design stages”, in Automation in Construction, vol. 18, issue 2, pp. 153-163. [Online] Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.07.003 [Accessed 24 November 2019].